SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

PRIYANKA SRIVASTAVA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P.. – Respondent


Advocates:
AJAY KUMARSUNIL KUMAR JAIN

Reportable

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.781 OF 2012

Mrs. Priyanka Srivastava and Another

Appellants

Versus

State of U.P. and Others

Respondents

J U D G M E N T

Dipak Misra, J.

The present appeal projects and frescoes a scenario which is

not only disturbing but also has the potentiality to create a stir

compelling one to ponder in a perturbed state how some

unscrupulous, unprincipled and deviant litigants can ingeniously

and innovatively design in a nonchalant manner to knock at the

doors of the Court, as if, it is a laboratory where multifarious

experiments can take place and such skillful persons can adroitly

Digitally signed by

Chetan Kumar

Date: 2015.03.25

12:46:16 IST

Reason:

Signature Not Verified

2

abuse the process of the Court at their own will and desire by

painting a canvas of agony by assiduous assertions made in the

application though the real intention is to harass the statutory

authorities, without any remote remorse, with the inventive design

primarily to create a mental pressure on the said officials as

individuals, for they would not like to be dragged to a court of law to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top