SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

S.B. SINHA,MARKANDEY KATJU
V. VENKATA SUBBARAO – Appellant
Versus
STATE REP. BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE,A.P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Y. RAJA GOPALA RAOD. BHARATHI REDDY

http://JUDIS.NIC.IN

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Page 1 of 5

CASE NO.:

Appeal (crl.) 970 of 2000

PETITIONER:

V. Venkata Subbarao

RESPONDENT:

State represented by Inspector of Police, A.P.

DATE OF JUDGMENT: 12/12/2006

BENCH:

S.B. Sinha & Markandey Katju

JUDGMENT:

J U D G M E N T

S.B. Sinha, J.

Appellant herein was working as a Surveyor in the Mandal Revenue

Office. He was a military personnel.

Admittedly, a demand was made by a Mandal Revenue Officer

(MRO) of P. Bhemavaram village of Butchayyupate Mandalam in

Vishakhapatnam District for allowing P.W.3 (M. Subrahmanya Raju) to cut

and remove casurina trees. P.W.2-Amaraneni Ammarao sold the land in

question to P.W.3. He made a complaint before the Inspector of Police, Anti

Corruption Bureau alleging that he had purchased 4 acres of land with

casurina growth and the same was being objected by the MRO on the

premise that a part thereof belonged to the Government.

The MRO, allegedly, wanted determination of the said question and

restrained him from lifting any casurina growth. He met the said MRO on

the next day informing him that no part of the Government land was mixed

up with his land. Alleged

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top