SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
VISHAL GHISULAL JAIN – Respondent


Advocates:
B. VIJAYALAKSHMI MENON

1

ITEM NO.15 Court 5 (Video Conferencing) SECTION XVII

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Civil Appeal No(s).3045/2020

TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LIMITED Appellant(s)

VERSUS

VISHAL GHISULAL JAIN Respondent(s)

(WITH IA No.85273/2020-EX-PARTE STAY )

Date : 20-11-2020 This appeal was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDU MALHOTRA

For Appellant(s)

Ms. Fereshte D. Sethna, Adv.

Ms. Anuradha Dutt, Adv.

Ms. Suman Yadav, Adv.

Mr. Aditya Sarin, Adv.

Ms. Aboli Mandlik, Adv.

Ms. B. Vijayalakshmi Menon, AOR

For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R

1

Ms Fereshte D Sethna, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant,

submits that there is a misreading of the provisions of Section 14 of the

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016 by the National Company Law Tribunal

and National Company Law Appellate Tribunal. It has been submitted that

Section 14 relates t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top