AMRITLAL – Appellant
Versus
UNION GOVT.TH.SECY.MIN.OF FINANCE – Respondent
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Page 1 of 2
CASE NO.:
Appeal (crl.) 838-841 of 1999
PETITIONER:
AMRITLAL AND ORS.
RESPONDENT:
UNION GOVERNMENT THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE AND ORS.
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 07/11/2000
BENCH:
UMESH C. BANERJEE & K.G. BALAKRISHNAN
JUDGMENT:
JUDGMENT
2000 Supp(4) SCR 450
The following Order of the Court was delivered :
In these appeals the validity of the order of detention passed by the Joint
Secretary to the Government of India stands challenged.
The contextual facts depict that the appellants were arrested pursuant to
the raid conducted by the officers of the Central Bureau of Narcotics
leading to the seizure of 132 Kgs. of opium and crime No. 22/96 was
registered against them under sections 8/18 of the Narcotics Drugs and
Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short ’the Act’). The appellants
prayed for being released on bail, but the Addl. District Judge, Neemuch,
rejected the application. Subsequently however they were detained under
section 3(1) of the Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and
Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988 (for short ’the PITNDPS Act’) by order
dated 5.6.1997. The record depicts that the ground
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.