SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

PREETI – Appellant
Versus
MANOJ KUMAR – Respondent


Advocates:
PULKIT TARE

ORDER

1. By presenting this petition under Section 25 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, the petitioner-wife seeks transfer of proceedings instituted by the respondent-husband under Section 25 of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 bearing Case No. GW 3/2023, titled “Manoj Kumar vs. Preeti”, from the Court of the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Chandigarh to the Family Court, West District, New Delhi or any other court of competent jurisdiction at New Delhi, on the grounds urged therein.

2. This transfer petition was considered by an Hon’ble Judge on 14.08.2023. In the third paragraph it has been recorded that the petitioner-wife is residing in New Delhi. According to the petitioner-wife, she has been residing in Chandigarh although she has her office in Panchkula.

3. Since there has been an erroneous recording of the place of residence of the petitioner-wife in the third paragraph of the order dated Digitally signed by Rajni Mukhi Date: 2023.09.25 19:10:44 IST Reason:

    Signature Not Verified 14.08.2023, an application (I.A No. 171122 of 2023) has been moved on her behalf for rectification of the said order dated 14.08.2023.

4. I.A No. 1

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top