SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SAMTA NAVALAKHA – Appellant
Versus
VINEET NAVALAKHA – Respondent


Advocates:
MERUSAGAR SAMANTARAY

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION

Transfer Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 1193/2015

SAMTA NAVALAKHA Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

VINEET NAVALAKHA Respondent(s)

O R D E R

Mr. Pushpinder Singh, learned counsel appearing for the

petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the Transfer Petition.

In view of the request made, the Transfer Petition is

dismissed as withdrawn.

.....................J

(PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE)

.....................J

(AMITAVA ROY)

NEW DELHI;

22ND JULY, 2016.

Digitally signed by

VISHAL ANAND

Date: 2016.07.26

11:55:02 IST

Reason:

Signature Not Verified

ITEM NO.2 COURT NO.9 SECTION XVIA

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Transfer Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 1193/2015

SAMTA NAVALAKHA Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

VINEET NAVALAKHA Respondent(s)

(With appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. of Annexures and

stay and office report)

(A

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top