SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

GHATGE PATIL INDUSTRIES LTD. – Appellant
Versus
COMMNR. OF CENTRAL EXCISE, PUNE – Respondent


Advocates:
M. P. DEVANATHP. PARMESWARAN

ORDER

In C.A.No.8484/2003 The appeal is disposed of as having be come infructuous in terms of the signed order.

Signature Not Verified In C.A.No.1996/2006 Digitally signed by Suman Wadhwa Date: 2015.03.21 13:37:01 IST Reason: Learned counsel for the Revenue states that he has not been given any instructions to appear in this appeal and he is not aware as to whom this appeal is granted fo r arguments. He has appeared in C.A.No.8484/2003, at our request he has agreed to appear in the other appeal as well.

The learned counsel seeks two days’ time to prepare that case.

List on 18.3.2015. (SUMAN WADHWA) (SUMAN JAIN) AR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (SIGNED ORDER IS PLACED ON THE FILE) IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 8484 OF 2003 Ghatge Patil Appellant(s) VERSUS Commnr. Of Central Excise,Pune Respondent(s) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1996 OF 2006 O R D E R In C.A.No. 8484/2003 The appellant/assessee is the manufacturer of


      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
      whatsapp-icon Back to top