M.B. SHAH,B. P. SINGH,H.K. SEMA.
NAGAPPA – Appellant
Versus
GURUDAYAL SINGH . – Respondent
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Page 1 of 11
CASE NO.:
Appeal (civil) 7989 of 2002
PETITIONER:
Nagappa
RESPONDENT:
Gurudayal Singh & Ors.
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 03/12/2002
BENCH:
M.B. SHAH, B. P. SINGH & H.K. SEMA.
JUDGMENT:
J U D G M E N T
(Arising out of S.L.P. (C) No.19562 of 1999)
Shah, J.
Leave granted.
Question involved in this appeal is whether one time
payment of compensation to a poor agriculturist would be sufficient to
meet the future medical expenses? It is true that lump-sum
compensation contemplating future eventualities can be granted but at
the same time Is it permissible under the Act to grant recurring
medical expenses to such a victim? Secondly, whether amendment to
the claim petition could be granted at the appellate stage?
Before we deal with this question, we would narrate a few facts.
The appellant, a poor agriculturist, along with some other persons was
travelling in a bullock cart on 6.2.1985 which met with an accident
with a truck as a result of which he suffered injuries including the
injury on right foot and right ankle exposing soft tissues and bones
which was subsequently required to be amputated. Other persons
also sustained in
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.