R.M. LODHA,ANIL R. DAVE,RANJAN GOGOI
DEEPAK AGGARWAL – Appellant
Versus
KESHAV KAUSHIK . – Respondent
Page 1
JUDGMENT
REPORTABLE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 561 OF 2013
(Arising out of SLP(C) No. 17463 of 2010)
Deepak Aggarwal
…… Appellant
Vs.
Keshav Kaushik and others
…… Respondents
WITH
CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 562-567 OF 2013
(Arising out of SLP(C) Nos. 17723-17728 of 2010)
CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 568-572 OF 2013
(Arising out of SLP(C) Nos. 17793-17797 of 2010)
CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 573-578 OF 2013
(Arising out of SLP(C) Nos. 17366-17371 of 2010)
CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 579-584 OF 2013
(Arising out of SLP(C) Nos. 21344-21349 of 2010)
CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 585-590 OF 2013
(Arising out of SLP(C) Nos. 23205-23210 of 2010)
CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 591-596 OF 2013
(Arising out of SLP(C) Nos. 32273-32278 of 2011)
JUDGMENT
R.M. LODHA, J.
Leave granted. What is the meaning of the expression ‘the
service’ in Article 233(2) of the Constitution of India? What is meant by
1
Page 2
JUDGMENT
‘advocate’ or ‘pleader’ under Article 233(2)? Whether a District
Attorney/Additional District Attorney/Public Prosecutor/Assistant Public
Prosecutor/Assistant Advocate General, who is full time employ
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.