SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

JETHANAND – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. – Respondent


Advocates:
BHUVNESHWARI PATHAK

ITEM NO.5 Court 5 (Video Conferencing) SECTION II

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s).6174/2021

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 22-01-2021

in CRMABA No.1234/2021 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At

Allahabad)

JETHANAND Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

STATE OF U.P. & ANR. Respondent(s)

(With appls.for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment,

exemption from filing O.T.)

Date : 24-08-2021 This petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI

For Petitioner(S)

Mr. Rahul Kaushik, Adv.

Ms. Bhuvneshwari Pathak, AOR

Mr. Adbhut Pathak, Adv.

Ms. Shilpi Satyapriya Satyam,Adv.

For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R

Issue notice.

There shall be stay of arrest of the petitioner

in connection with FIR No.13/2021 dated 11.01.2021

re

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top