MAHESHWAR PERI – Appellant
Versus
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD THROUGH REGISTRAR GENERAL – Respondent
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 549 OF 2016
(Arising out of S.L.P. (Criminal) No. 5032 of 2015)
MAHESHWAR PERI & OTHERS
… APPELLANT(S)
VERSUS
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT
ALLAHABAD THROUGH REGISTRAR
GENERAL
…
RESPONDENT(S)
J U D G M E N T
KURIAN, J.:
Leave granted.
2.
What is the period of limitation for suo motu initiation of con-
tempt proceedings, is the short question for consideration in this
case.
3.
The Outlook Magazine, in its 10.11.2008 edition, published an
article authored by the third appellant, which mainly dealt with the
infamous Provident Fund Scam. The names of the Judges, who are
allegedly involved in the case, were published.
4.
On 18.11.2008, one Mr. Manoj Kumar Srivastava and Mr. Veer
Singh, Advocates practicing in the High Court of Allahabad, filed Mis-
cellaneous Application No. 21 of 2008 with the following prayer:
“It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this
Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to proceed
1
REPORTABLE
Digitally signed by
JAYANT KUMAR ARORA
Date: 2016.07.06
15:20:01 IST
Reason:
Sig
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.