SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DR. AR. LAKSHMANAN,ALTAMAS KABIR
RUMA CHAKRABORTY – Appellant
Versus
SUDHA RANI BANERJEE – Respondent


Advocates:
KAMINI JAISWAL

http://JUDIS.NIC.IN

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Page 1 of 11

CASE NO.:

Appeal (civil) 2565 of 2001

PETITIONER:

Ruma Chakraborty

RESPONDENT:

Sudha Rani Banerjee & Anr.

DATE OF JUDGMENT: 04/10/2005

BENCH:

Dr. AR. Lakshmanan & Altamas Kabir

JUDGMENT:

J U D G M E N T

Dr. AR. Lakshmanan, J.

The appellant, who is an unsuccessful intervenor in both the courts below, is the

divorced wife of the recorded sole tenant (second respondent herein) who is also the

sole defendant in the suit filed by the first respondent herein \026 Sudha Rani Banerjee.

The instant appeal is against the judgment and order dated 26.09.2000 passed

by the High Court of Calcutta in C.O. No. 582 of 2000 rejecting the appellant’s

application for being added as a party defendant under Order 1 Rule 10 (2) of the

C.P.C. The High Court concurred with the judgment and order dated 02.02.2000

passed by the IIIrd Civil Judge, Alipore. The High Court rejected the plea of the

appellant that she is directly interested in the tenanted suit premises by way of her

entitlement towards maintenance which includes residence as per t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top