DR. AR. LAKSHMANAN,ALTAMAS KABIR
RUMA CHAKRABORTY – Appellant
Versus
SUDHA RANI BANERJEE – Respondent
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Page 1 of 11
CASE NO.:
Appeal (civil) 2565 of 2001
PETITIONER:
Ruma Chakraborty
RESPONDENT:
Sudha Rani Banerjee & Anr.
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 04/10/2005
BENCH:
Dr. AR. Lakshmanan & Altamas Kabir
JUDGMENT:
J U D G M E N T
Dr. AR. Lakshmanan, J.
The appellant, who is an unsuccessful intervenor in both the courts below, is the
divorced wife of the recorded sole tenant (second respondent herein) who is also the
sole defendant in the suit filed by the first respondent herein \026 Sudha Rani Banerjee.
The instant appeal is against the judgment and order dated 26.09.2000 passed
by the High Court of Calcutta in C.O. No. 582 of 2000 rejecting the appellant’s
application for being added as a party defendant under Order 1 Rule 10 (2) of the
C.P.C. The High Court concurred with the judgment and order dated 02.02.2000
passed by the IIIrd Civil Judge, Alipore. The High Court rejected the plea of the
appellant that she is directly interested in the tenanted suit premises by way of her
entitlement towards maintenance which includes residence as per t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.