AMAN KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent
http://JUDIS.NIC.IN
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Page 1 of 6
CASE NO.:
Appeal (crl.) 1016 of 1997
PETITIONER:
Aman Kumar and Anr.
RESPONDENT:
State of Haryana
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 10/02/2004
BENCH:
DORAISWAMY RAJU & ARIJIT PASAYAT.
JUDGMENT:
JUDGMENT
ARIJIT PASAYAT,J
Two appellants faced trial for having allegedly
committed rape on a girl of tender age whose name need not
be indicated and she can be described as the victim or the
prosecutrix. The trial Court found the accused persons
guilty of offence punishable under Section 376 (2)(g) of the
Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the ’IPC’). They were each
sentenced to undergo imprisonment for 10 years and to pay a
fine of Rs.500/-each with default stipulation. In appeal,
the conviction and sentence were upheld.
Prosecution version in a nutshell is that on 5.8.1993
the prosecutrix had gone to the field to ease herself at
about 10.00 a.m. When she had reached near the field, the
accused persons caught hold of her right arm and dragged her
forcibly to the field. Accused Shiv Dayal shut her mouth
with her chuni and both the accused persons thereafter
forcibly raped her. They threatened to kill her if she told
abo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.