SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

AMAN KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


Advocates:
KISHAN DATTAVINAY KUMAR GARG

http://JUDIS.NIC.IN

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Page 1 of 6

CASE NO.:

Appeal (crl.) 1016 of 1997

PETITIONER:

Aman Kumar and Anr.

RESPONDENT:

State of Haryana

DATE OF JUDGMENT: 10/02/2004

BENCH:

DORAISWAMY RAJU & ARIJIT PASAYAT.

JUDGMENT:

JUDGMENT

ARIJIT PASAYAT,J

Two appellants faced trial for having allegedly

committed rape on a girl of tender age whose name need not

be indicated and she can be described as the victim or the

prosecutrix. The trial Court found the accused persons

guilty of offence punishable under Section 376 (2)(g) of the

Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short the ’IPC’). They were each

sentenced to undergo imprisonment for 10 years and to pay a

fine of Rs.500/-each with default stipulation. In appeal,

the conviction and sentence were upheld.

Prosecution version in a nutshell is that on 5.8.1993

the prosecutrix had gone to the field to ease herself at

about 10.00 a.m. When she had reached near the field, the

accused persons caught hold of her right arm and dragged her

forcibly to the field. Accused Shiv Dayal shut her mouth

with her chuni and both the accused persons thereafter

forcibly raped her. They threatened to kill her if she told

abo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top