SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
R C TOBACCO (P) LTD – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
None 001700/2005



zCHAMBER MATTER SECTION XVIA

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

REVIEW PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1700 OF 2005

IN

TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) NO.27 OF 2004

R.C. Tobacco (P) Ltd. & Anr. ..Petitioners

vs.

Union of India & Ors. ..Respondents

[with R.P.(C) No. 1778/2005 in T.C.(C) No. 23/2004, R.P.(C) No. 1779/2005

in T.C.(C) No. 24/2004, R.P.(C) No. 1938/2005 in T.C.(C) No. 25/2004,

R.P.(C) No. 1701/2005 in T.C.(C) No. 26/2004, R.P.(C) No. 1702/2005 in

T.C.(C) No. 28/2004, R.P.(C) No. 1703/2005 in T.C.(C) No. 29/2004, R.P.

(C) No. 1704/2005 in T.C.(C) No. 30/2004, R.P.(C) No. 1705/2005 in T.C.

(C) No. 31/2004, R.P.(C) No. 1706/2005 in T.C.(C) No. 32/2004, R.P.(C)

No. 1928/2005 in T.C.(C) No. 33/2004, R.P.(C) No. 1707/2005 in T.C.(C)

No. 34/2004, R.P.(C) No. 1708/2005 in T.C.(C) No. 35/2004 and R.P.(C) No.

1956/2005 in T.P.(C) No.151/2004 (with office report//with appln.(s) for

c/delay in filing revision petition & office report)]

Date: 15/12/2005 These Petitions were circulated today.

CORAM :

HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE RUMA PAL

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE TARUN CHATTERJEE

By Circulation

UPON perusing papers the Court made the following

O R D E R

Delay condoned.

The review petitions are dismissed.

(D.P. WALIA) (MADHU SAXENA)

AR-cum-PS Court Master

(Signed Order is placed on the file)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

REVIEW PETITION (CIVIL) NO.1700 OF 2005

IN

TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) NO.27 OF 2004

R.C. Tobacco (P) Ltd. & Anr. ..Petitioners

vs.

Union of India & Ors. ..Respondents

[with R.P.(C) No. 1778/2005 in T.C.(C) No. 23/2004, R.P.(C) No.

1779/2005 in T.C.(C) No. 24/2004, R.P.(C) No. 1938/2005 in T.C.(C)

No. 25/2004, R.P.(C) No. 1701/2005 in T.C.(C) No. 26/2004, R.P.(C)

No. 1702/2005 in T.C.(C) No. 28/2004, R.P.(C) No. 1703/2005 in T.C.

(C) No. 29/2004, R.P.(C) No. 1704/2005 in T.C.(C) No. 30/2004, R.P.

(C) No. 1705/2005 in T.C.(C) No. 31/2004, R.P.(C) No. 1706/2005 in

T.C.(C) No. 32/2004, R.P.(C) No. 1928/2005 in T.C.(C) No. 33/2004,

R.P.(C) No. 1707/2005 in T.C.(C) No. 34/2004, R.P.(C) No. 1708/2005

in T.C.(C) No. 35/2004 and R.P.(C) No. 1956/2005 in T.P.(C)

No.151/2004]

O R D E R

Delay condoned.

We have carefully gone through the review petitions and the

connected papers. We do not find any ground whatsoever to entertain

the same. Accordingly, the review petitions are dismissed.

.....................J

(RUMA PAL)

.......................J

(TARUN CHATTERJEE)

New Delhi;

December 15, 2005.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top