SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
GREENVALY TOWERS PVT LTD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent
None 005028/2006



æITEM NO.26 COURT NO.1 SECTION XVI

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).25146-25147/2005

(From the judgement and order dated 16/11/2005 and 21/11/2005 in APOT No.252/2005 in GA

No.1227/2005 in WP No.367/2005 of The HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA)

GREENVALY TOWERS PVT. LTD. & ANR. Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS. Respondent(s)

(With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment, exemption from filing O

.T., prayer

for interim relief and office report)

With S.L.P. (C) Nos.25742-25745 of 2005

(With appln.(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgement,

permission to file additional documents, prayer for interim relief and office report)

Date: 16/12/2005 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.K. THAKKER

For Petitioner(s) Mr. Mukul Rohtagi,Sr.Adv.

In SLP 25146-47/2005: Mr. Utpal Majumdar,Adv.

Mr. Sanjiv Sen,Adv.

Mr. Dipak Kumar Jena,Adv.

In SLP 25742-45/2005: Mr. Soli Sorabjee,Sr.Adv.

Dr. A.M. Singhvi,Sr.Adv.

Mr. Pallav Shishodia,Adv.

Mr. Santosh Kanodia,Adv.

Mr. Rajendra Singhvi,Adv.

Mr. Amit Bhandhari,Adv.

Mr. Nikhil,Adv.

Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh,Adv.

For Respondent(s) Mr. Bhaskar P. Gupta,Sr.Adv.

Mr. Tara Chandra Sharma,Adv.

Mr. Ansu Nath Banerjee,Adv.

Ms. Neelam Sharma,Adv.

...2/

-

- 2 -

For R-18 in SLP (C) Mr. Altaf Ahmed,Sr.Adv.

24742-45/2005: Mr. Surya Kant,Adv.

UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R

Interlocutory applications are allowed.

Issue notice. Dasti service, in addition, is permitted.

Mr. Tara Chandra Sharma and Mr. Surya Kant, lear

ned

advocates, accept notice on behalf of the respondent-caveators.

Steps be taken to serve the remaining respondents.

Reply affidavits be filed within four weeks. Rejoinder affidav

its

be filed within two weeks thereafter.

Pending further orders, we stay the demolition but, at the sa

me

time, direct that no further construction would be undertaken.

In the

meanwhile, the prosecution is also stayed.

[ T.I. Rajput ] [ Radha R. Bhatia ]

A.R.-cum-P.S. Court Master

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top