ü 1

ITEM NO.27 & 42 COURT NO.8 SECTION XI

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).25143/2005

(From the judgement and order dated 25/11/2005 in WP No. 7318/2005 of The HIGH COURT OF

U.P AT LUCKNOW)

DILBAGH SINGH Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

STATE OF U.P. & ORS. Respondent(s)

With SLP(C) No. 26109/05

(With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned Judgment,exemption from filing O.

T.

and prayer for interim relief and office report)

Date: 16/12/2005 This Petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.K. SEMA

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.N. SRIKRISHNA

For Petitioner(s) Mr. Tapash Kumar Singh,Adv.

Mr.Dinesh Chandra Pandey,Adv.

Mr. Ranjit Kumar,Sr.Adv.

Mr. Vijay Hansaria,Sr.Adv.

Mr. Jitendra Mohan Sharma,Adv.

For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R

SLP(C) No. 25143/05

Heard. We see no reason to interfere. The Special Leave Petition is dismisse

d.

SLP(C) No. 26109/05

Heard. We see no reason to interfere. The Special Leave Petition is dismisse

d.

2

However, we notice that the order impugned is passed in writ

petition No. 7318 (M/B) of

2005. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that along with the writ pe

tition, he also

filed CM application of 2005 for interim relief. It appears from the

order impugned that CM

application has not been considered by the High Court. His lease is

expiring on 5th January,2006,

therefore, we request the High Court to consider the CM application before the expiry of tha

t order as

it deem fit and proper.

(Ganga Thakur) (Prem Prakash)

PS to Registrar Assistant Registrar