SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CHARANJIT SINGH GUJRAL – Appellant
Versus
HARYANA STATE AGRI MARK BOARD – Respondent
None 000430/2010



&$CHAMBER MATTER SECTION IV

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

REVIEW PETITION (C) NO(s). 430 OF 2010

IN

CIVIL APPEAL 2557/2008

CHARANJIT SINGH GUJRAL & ANR. Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

HARYANA STATE AGRI.MARK.BOARD & ORS. Respondent(s)

WITH

REVIEW PETITION (C) NO(s). 458 OF 2010

IN

CIVIL APPEAL 2556/2008

DARSHAN LAL & ANR. Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

HARYANA STATE AGRI.MARK.BOARD & ORS. Respondent(s)

Date: 11/03/2010 This Petition was circulated today.

CORAM :

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HARJIT SINGH BEDI

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE CYRIAC JOSEPH

By Circulation

UPON perusing papers the Court made the following

O R D E R

The review petitions are dismissed in terms

of the signed order.

(KALYANI GUPTA) (VINOD KULVI)

SR. P.A. COURT MASTER

[SIGNED ORDER IS PLACED ON THE FILE.]

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

REVIEW PETITION (C) NO. 430 OF 2010

IN

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2557 OF 2008

CHARANJIT SINGH GUJRAL & ANR. ..... PETITIONERS

VERSUS

HARYANA STATE AGR. MARKETING BOARD & ORS. ..... RESPONDENTS

WITH

REVIEW PETITION (C) NO. 458 OF 2010

IN

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2556 OF 2008

DARSHAN LAL & ANR. ..... PETITIONERS

VERSUS

HARYANA STATE AGR. MARKETING BOARD & ORS. ..... RESPONDENTS

O R D E R

Having gone through the review petitions and

their connected documents, we are not inclined to

review the order of this Court dated 8th April, 2008.

The review petitions are, therefore, dismissed.

......................J

[HARJIT SINGH BEDI]

......................J

[CYRIAC JOSEPH]

NEW DELHI

MARCH 11, 2010.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

REVIEW PETITION (C) NO. 372 OF 2010

IN

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2554 OF 2008

ASHOK MITTAL ..... PETITIONER

VERSUS

HARYANA STATE AGR. MARKETING BOARD & ORS. ..... RESPONDENTS

WITH

REVIEW PETITION (C) NO. 375 OF 2010

IN

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2550 OF 2008

RAMESH MITTAL ..... PETITIONER

VERSUS

HARYANA STATE AGR. MARKETING BOARD & ORS. ..... RESPONDENTS

WITH

REVIEW PETITION (C) NO. 376 OF 2010

IN

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2555 OF 2008

RAJINDER MITTAL ..... PETITIONER

VERSUS

HARYANA STATE AGR. MARKETING BOARD & ORS. ..... RESPONDENTS

O R D E R

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top