lITEM NO.6 Court No. 33 SECTION IIA

SUPREME COURT OF I ND I A

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl)... 2009

CRLMP.NO(s). 10532

(From the judgement and order dated 27/01/2009 in CRLA No. 552/1997

of The HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH)

AMARJIT SINGH Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

STATE OF PUNJAB Respondent(s)

CRLMP 10532 (C/delay in filing SLP)

Date: 23/07/2009 This Petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.B. SINHA

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK VERMA

For Petitioner(s) Mr. Rajiv K. Garg, Adv.

Mr. Vineet Garg, Adv.

Mr. Annam D.N. Rao, Adv.

For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following

ORDER

It is stated by the learned counsel that the contention that the

petitioner had nothing to do with the offence in question was urged

before the High Court; but from a perusal of the order of the High Court

it does not appear that such a contention has been raised before it. As a

matter of fact, the High Court has noticed that the learned counsel

appearing on behalf of the appellants before it could not be able to

question the correctness of the well-reasoned judgment. We are,

therefore, not in a position to agree with the submission of the learned

counsel that any other or further contentions had been raised on behalf

of the appellants therein. It is well-known that this Court shall go by

the judges’ record and thus if any other or further contention has been

raised before the High Court which has not been considered by it, the

only remedy open to the petitioner is to approach the High Court itself.

The special leave petition is dismissed with the aforementioned

observations.

(KALYANI GUPTA) (S.S.R. KRISHNA)

SR. P.A. COURT MASTER

: 2 :