SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
PURUSHOTTAMDAS – Appellant
Versus
LAXMILAL – Respondent
None 000701/2012



ÜITEM NO. Chamber SECTION IVA

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

REVIEW PETITION (C) NO(s). 701 OF 2012 IN SLP(C) 36052/2011

PURUSHOTTAMDAS & ANR Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

LAXMILAL Respondent(s)

(With appln(s) for c/delay in filing review petition

Date: 12/04/2012 This Petition was circulated today.

CORAM :

HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE GYAN SUDHA MISRA

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR

By Circulation

UPON perusing papers the Court made the following

O R D E R

Delay condoned.

The review petition is dismissed in terms of the

signed order.

(Shashi Sareen) (Veena Khera)

Court Master Court Master

(Signed order is placed on the file)

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

REVIEW PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 701 OF 2012

IN

SLP(C) No. 36052 of 2011

PURUSHOTTAMDAS & ANR. .......Petitioner(s)

Versus

LAXMILAL .......Respondent(s)

O R D E R

A decree of eviction on the ground of sub-letting of

the suit premises by the petitioner in favour of his brother

was passed against the petitioner which he had challenged by

way of special leave petition before this Court. After

hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, the special leave

petition was dismissed but the time to vacate the premises was

extended till 31st March, 2012 subject to filing the usual

undertaking.

The petitioner has now filed this review petition on the

plea that the respondent-landlord had failed to

-2-

discharge the burden that the petitioner had sublet the suit

premises in favour of his brother.

We have considered the reasonings assigned in support

of his version. But we are clearly of the view that this is

merely a reiteration of the submissions which were urged at

the time of admission of the special leave petition but did

not find favour with the court. The same grounds cannot be

allowed to be urged by way of a review petition as it fails to

satisfy the conditions required for entertaining a review

petition.

Under the circumstance, this review petition is

dismissed.

......................J.

(GYAN SUDHA MISRA)

......................J.

(JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR)

New Delhi;

April 12, 2012.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top