SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
PRATHAM STEELS PRIVATE LTD – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
None 009086/2013



T

ITEM NO.30 COURT NO.4 SECTION XVI

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).9086-9088/2013

(From the judgement and order dated 07/01/2013 in GA No.2316/2012, APOT

No.412/2012 IN WP No.1656/2010 of The HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA)

PRATHAM STEELS PRIVATE LTD AND ANR Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)

(With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned Judgment and

prayer for interim relief)

Date: 11/03/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AFTAB ALAM

HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE RANJANA PRAKASH DESAI

For Petitioner(s) Mr. R.F. Nariman, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Prateek Jalan, Adv.

Mr. Sidharth Bhatnagar, adv.

Ms. Sonia Dube, Adv.

Mr. S.Chakraborty, Adv.

Mr. Shivendra Singh, Adv.

Mr. Anurag Mishra, Adv.

For M/S. Legal Options

For Respondent(s) Mr. S.P. Singh, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Syed Tanweer Ahmad, Adv.

Ms. Prachi Bajpayee, Adv.

For Mr. Shreekant N. Terdal,Adv.

UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R

In course of submissions, Mr. R.F. Nariman, learned senior

advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioners, submits a sketch

map before us showing the present position where line no.5 is

being laid and the position suggested on behalf of the petitioners

that would not affect the loading operations on line no.6 that was

laid down by the petitioners.

...2/-

-2-

Mr. S.P. Singh, learned senior counsel appearing for the

respondents, may consider the suggestion as per the plan submitted

by Mr. Nariman and file an affidavit responding to Mr. Nariman’s

submissions.

Put up on April 5, 2013.

|(Neetu Khajuria) |(Sneh Bala Mehra)

|

|Sr.P.A. |Court Master |

T

ITEM NO.30 COURT NO.4 SECTION XVI

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).9086-9088/2013

(From the judgement and order dated 07/01/2013 in GA No.2316/2012, APOT

No.412/2012 IN WP No.1656/2010 of The HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA)

PRATHAM STEELS PRIVATE LTD AND ANR Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)

(With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned Judgment and

prayer for interim relief)

Date: 11/03/2013 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AFTAB ALAM

HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE RANJANA PRAKASH DESAI

For Petitioner(s) Mr. R.F. Nariman, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Prateek Jalan, Adv.

Mr. Sidharth Bhatnagar, adv.

Ms. Sonia Dube, Adv.

Mr. S.Chakraborty, Adv.

Mr. Shivendra Singh, Adv.

Mr. Anurag Mishra, Adv.

For M/S. Legal Options

For Respondent(s) Mr. S.P. Singh, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Syed Tanweer Ahmad, Adv.

Ms. Prachi Bajpayee, Adv.

For Mr. Shreekant N. Terdal,Adv.

UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top