SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
SHASHIKALA – Appellant
Versus
GANGALASHMAMMA – Respondent


1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL NO.2836 OF 2015

SHASHIKALA & ORS.

APPELLANT(S)

VERSUS

GANGALAKSHMAMMA & ANR.

RESPONDENT(S)

O R D E R

This appeal is before three-judge Bench because of

difference of opinion between the Hon’ble Judges of this

Court. The difference of opinion was only on the issue

whether the future prospects are to be taken into

consideration for awarding compensation when the deceased

is self-employed person. That difference of opinion has

been resolved by the Constitution Bench’s decision

rendered in the case of National Insurance Co. Ltd vs

Pranay Sethi & Ors. - (2017) 16 SCC 680, and that issue

is, therefore, no longer alive.

As far as the present case is concerned, the

deceased viz., H.S. Ravi was aged 46 years and he was

engaged in transport business. His income as assessed by

the two-Judge Bench of this Court was Rs.2,02,911/-. In

terms of the judgment in Pranay Sethi & Ors. (supra),

Digitally signed by

SANJAY KUMAR

Date: 2019.02.20

16:50:47 IST

Reason:

Signature Not Verified

2

twenty five per cent of the income has to be added

towards future prospects to the compensation whic

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top