SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

R.M. LODHA,MADAN B. LOKUR,KURIAN JOSEPH
SUKHDEV SINGH – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA . – Respondent


Advocates:
ANSAR AHMAD CHAUDHARYB. KRISHNA PRASAD

Page 1

JUDGMENT

1

REPORTABLE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5892 OF 2006

SUKHDEV SINGH

... APPELLANT(s)

Versus

UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS

... RESPONDENT(s)

O R D E R

While granting leave on December 12, 2006, a

two Judge Bench (S.B. Sinha and Markandey Katju, JJ.)

felt that there was inconsistency in the decisions of

this Court in U.P. Jal Nigam and others vs. Prabhat

Chandra Jain and others1, and Union of India and

another vs. Major Bahadur Singh2 and consequently,

opined that the matter should be heard by a larger

Bench. This is how the matter has come up for

consideration before us.

2.

The referral order dated December 12, 2006

reads as follows:

“The appellant herein was appointed as Deputy

Director of Training on or about 13.11.1992. He

1 (1996)2 SCC 363

2 (2006)1 SCC 368

Page 2

JUDGMENT

2

attended a training programme on Computer Applied

Technology. He was sent on deputation on various

occasions in 1997,1998 and yet again in 2000.

Indisputably, remarks in his Annual Confidential

Reports throughout had

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top