SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

P SATHASIVAM,RANJAN GOGOI,N.V. RAMANA
CBI,ACB,MUMBAI – Appellant
Versus
NARENDRA LAL JAIN – Respondent


Advocates:
P. PARMESWARANK. N. RAI

Page 1

JUDGMENT

REPORTABLE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.517 OF 2014

(Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Crl) No. 6138 OF 2006)

CBI, ACB, MUMBAI

.

... APPELLANT (S)

VERSUS

NARENDRA LAL JAIN & ORS.

... RESPONDENT (S)

J U D G M E N T

RANJAN GOGOI, J.

1.

Leave granted.

2.

The appellant, Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI)

ACB, Mumbai seeks to challenge an order dated 28.10.2005

passed by the High Court of Bombay quashing the criminal

proceedings against the respondents Narendra Lal Jain,

Jayantilal L. Shah and Ramanlal Lalchand Jain. The aforesaid

1

Page 2

JUDGMENT

respondents had moved the High Court under Section 482

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short “Cr.P.C.”)

challenging the orders passed by the learned Trial Court

refusing to discharge them and also questioning the

continuance of the criminal proceedings registered against

them. Of the three accused, Jayantilal L. Shah, the court is

informed, has died during the pendency of the present

appeal truncating the scope thereof to an adjudication of the

correctness of the decision of the Hig

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top