SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
SWETA GUPTA S/D/W/Thru:- ANURAG GUPTA :   GALI NO 2, MADHU VIHAR COLONY, DELHI ROAD, REWARI, HARYANA , DISTRICT: REWARI ,REWARI , HARYANA – Appellant
Versus
ANURAG GUPTA S/D/W/Thru:- GIRISH KUMAR GUPTA :   FLAT NO 902, P P E TOWER, OMAX PALM GREENS, NEW GREATER NOIDA, DISTIRCT GAUTAM BUDH NAGAR ,GAUTAM BUDDHA NAGAR * , UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent
None 001050/2019



SECTION – XVIA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA   

          LISTED ON  : 

   CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION

       

   

CHAMBER NO. : 

                        

   

         ITEM NO.     :  

TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 1050 OF 2019

     WITH

INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 79100 OF 2019

(Application for Stay)

Sweta Gupta

 

...Petitioner

VERSUS

Anurag Gupta

...Respondent

OFFICE REPORT ON DEFAULT

The Transfer Petition above mentioned was listed before the Hon’ble Court on

01.07.2019, when the following Order was passed:­

“Application   for   exemption   from   filing

official translation is allowed. 

Issue notice.

In   the   meantime,   there   shall   be   stay   of

further   proceedings   in   H.M.A.No.164/2019   titled

as   Anurag   Gupta   v.   Sweta   Gupta   pending   in   the

Court   of   Principal   Judge,   Family   Court,   Gautam

Budh Nagar, Uttar Pradesh until further orders.” 

Accordingly,   notice   to   the   sole   respondent   on   both   addresses   was   issued

through Registered A.D. post on 24.07.2019.

It is submitted that as per tracking report of postal  authority, notice has not

been delivered to the sole respondent on first address with postal remarks “Insufficient

address”.

It is further submitted that as per tracking report to postal authority, notice has

not been delivered to the sole respondent on second address with postal remarks

“addressee left without instruction”.

It is further submitted that vide the Ld. Registrar Court’s orders dated 16.8.2019

and 10.12.2019, counsel for the petitioner has neither furnished fresh particulars

of   the   sole   respondent   nor   taken   fresh   steps   for   effecting   service   on   sole

respondent, hence fresh show cause notice could not be issued so far.

The matter above mentioned was listed before the Ld. Registrar Court on

17.2.2020 when the following order was passed:

P.T.O

“Ld. counsel for the petitioner has not

taken   requisite   steps   and   also   failed   to

furnish   fresh   particulars   for   effecting

service upon the Sole Respondent. Viewed thus,

matter   be   processed   for   listing   before   the

Hon’ble   Judge   in   Chambers   for   further

directions. Await Orders. List thereafter.”

Service of show cause notice is not complete.

The default on the part of the counsel for the petitioner is reported to the

Hon’ble Judge­in­Chambers with this Office Report on default.

Dated this the 19th day of February, 2020. 

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

Copy to :       Mr. Roopansh Purohit, Advocate

          

  

 

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

h

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top