SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
BHARAT KUMAR JALAN S/D/W/Thru:- LATE TOLARAM JALAN :   18 BALLYGUNGE PARK ROAD , DISTRICT: KOLKATA ,KOLKATA , WEST BENGAL – Appellant
Versus
ADITYA JALAN S/D/W/Thru:- LATE SHYAMSUNDAR JALAN :   R/AT 2801 2, BEAUMONDE TOWER APPASAHEB MARATHE MARG PRABHADEVI ,MUMBAI , MAHARASHTRA – Respondent
None 002779/2019



Advocates:
['KARANJAWALA & CO', 'BIJOY KUMAR JAIN[caveat][caveat', 'KHAITAN & CO [caveat', 'KHAITAN & CO [R']

SECTION XVI

  LISTED ON: 31.07.2019

  COURT NO.: 01

  ITEM NO. : 43

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) NOS. 2779­2782 of 2019

(With prayer for interim­relief)

RAJENDRA BAJORIA & ORS.

...PETITIONERS

Versus

HEMANT KUMAR JALAN & ORS.

...RESPONDENTS

OFFICE REPORT

The matters above­mentioned were listed before the Hon’ble

Court   on   15.2.2019,   when   the   Court   was   pleased   to   pass   the

following order:

“Application   for   bringing   on   record   the   legal

representatives   of   the   deceased   petitioner   no.6   is

allowed.

Issue   notice   on   the   special   leave   petitions   as

also   on   the   prayer   for   interim   relief,   returnable   on

25.3.2019.

In   the   meantime,   the   parties   are   directed   to

maintain status quo, as it exists today, and the interim

order dated 18.5.2017 passed by the Calcutta High Court

in GA No. 1730/2017 in CS No. 79/2017 shall continue.”

It is submitted that as per order quoted above cause title

has been amended accordingly and included in the paper­books.

Accordingly,   returnable   show   cause   notice   was   issued   to

Respondent Nos. 1 & 2 through M/s. Bijoy Kr. Jain & Khaitan & Co,

Advocates   and   Respondent   Nos.   3   to   24   through   registered   A.D.

post.

 

M/s.

 

Khaitan

 

&

 

Co.,

 

Advocates

 

have

 

filed

Vakalatnama/Appearance   and   counter   affidavit   on   behalf   of

respondent nos. 2, 3, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 and 21.

As per tracking report notice has been delivered to Respondent

Nos. 4, 5, 10, 13, 14, 15, 22, 23 & 24 but no one has entered

appearance on their behalf, so far and tracking report in respect

of Respondent No. 6 remarks shown “Insufficient Address”.

It is further submitted that Mr. Bijoy Kumar Jain, counsel

for respondent nos. 1 has filed counter affidavit.

­2­

Thereafter,   the   matters   above­mentioned   were   again   listed

before the Hon’ble Court on 25.3.2019, when the Court was pleased

to pass the following order:

“Service is not complete.

List these matters after service is complete.

Dasti is permitted.

Interim orders to continue in the meantime.”

It is submitted that fresh show cause notice was issued to

unserved respondent no. 6 by registered A.D. post as well as  by

dasti mode. As per tracking report remarks shown “Item Despatched

to Parcel hub delhi” in respect of respondent no. 6. 

It is further submitted that counsel for petitioner has not

filed affidavit of dasti service alongwith proof of service in

respect of respondent no. 6, so far.

Service of notice is incomplete on respondent no. 6.

The   matters   above­mentioned   are   listed   before   the   Hon’ble

Court with this Office report.  

Dated this the 30th day of July, 2019.

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

Copy to:

M/s. Karanjawala & Co., Advocates

Mr. Bijoy Kumar Jain, Advocate

M/s. Khaitan & Co., Advocates

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top