SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
GOVIND SINGH S/D/W/Thru:- JAGJEET SINGH YADAV : R/O VILLAGE SILAYATHA, PAARGANA JAURA , DISTRICT: ,MORENA , MADHYA PRADESH – Appellant
Versus
BRIJLAL S/D/W/Thru:- VANDAN SINGH : VILLAGE GATHI USRA, POLICE STATION EARADATT NAGAR , DISTRICT: AGRA ,AGRA , UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent
None 030402/2019
SEC-IV-A
LISTED ON 10.02.2020
LD. REGISTRAR COURT NO. 22
ITEM NO. 89
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) NO. 30402 OF 2019
GOVIND SINGH
...Petitioner
Versus
M/S. P.N.C. CONSTRUCTION COMPANY & ORS.
...Respondents
OFFICE REPORT
The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon’ble
Court on 17.12.2019, when the Court was pleased to pass the
following order:
“Delay condoned.
Issue notice.”
Accordingly, show cause notice was issued to all the
(three) respondentss on 27.12.2019 by regd. A.D. card. As
per tracking report (copy enclosed), notice has been
delivered upon Respondent No. 1 on 04.01.2020 but neither
Vakalat/Appearance nor counter affidavit has been filed on
behalf of Respondent No. 1 within 30 days from the date of
receipt of notice. However, Under Order 21 Rule 14 (I) of
Supreme Court Rules 2013 reads as under:
“Respondent to whom a notice in a Special Leave Petition
is issued or who had filed a caveat shall be entitled to
oppose the grant of leave or interim orders, without
filing any written objections. He shall also be at
liberty to file his objections within 30 days from the
date of receipt of notice or not later than 2 weeks
before the date appointed for hearing, whichever be
earlier, but shall do so only by setting out the grounds
in opposition to the questions of law or grounds set out
in the SLP and may produce such pleadings and documents
filed before the Court/Tribunal against whose order the
SLP is filed and shall also set out the grounds for not
granting interim order or for vacating interim order if
already granted.”
2
It is submitted that as per tracking report (copy
enclosed), notice has been undelivered with postal remarks,
”insufficient address” and “addresee left” in respect of
Respondent Nos. 2 & 3 respectively.
Service of notice is not complete upon respondent
nos. 2 & 3.
The matter above mentioned is listed before the Ld.
Registrar Court with this Office Report.
Dated this the 07th day of February, 2020.
BRANCH OFFICER
Copy to :
Mr. Ram Lal Roy, Advocate
BRANCH OFFICER
BA
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.