SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
GOVIND SINGH S/D/W/Thru:- JAGJEET SINGH YADAV :   R/O VILLAGE SILAYATHA, PAARGANA JAURA , DISTRICT: ,MORENA , MADHYA PRADESH – Appellant
Versus
BRIJLAL S/D/W/Thru:- VANDAN SINGH :   VILLAGE GATHI USRA, POLICE STATION EARADATT NAGAR , DISTRICT: AGRA ,AGRA , UTTAR PRADESH – Respondent
None 030402/2019



SEC-IV-A

LISTED ON 10.02.2020

LD. REGISTRAR COURT NO. 22

ITEM NO. 89

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) NO. 30402 OF 2019

GOVIND SINGH

...Petitioner

Versus

M/S. P.N.C. CONSTRUCTION COMPANY & ORS.

...Respondents

OFFICE REPORT

The matter above mentioned was listed before the Hon’ble

Court on 17.12.2019, when the Court was pleased to pass the

following order:

“Delay condoned.

Issue notice.

Accordingly, show cause notice was issued to all the

(three)  respondentss on 27.12.2019 by regd. A.D. card.   As

per   tracking   report   (copy   enclosed),   notice   has   been

delivered upon Respondent No. 1 on 04.01.2020   but neither

Vakalat/Appearance   nor   counter   affidavit   has   been   filed   on

behalf of Respondent No. 1 within 30 days from the date of

receipt  of  notice.  However,  Under Order  21  Rule  14  (I)  of

Supreme Court Rules 2013 reads as under:­

“Respondent to whom a notice in a Special Leave Petition

is issued or who had filed a caveat shall be entitled to

oppose   the   grant   of   leave  or   interim   orders,   without

filing   any   written   objections.   He   shall   also   be   at

liberty to file his objections within 30 days from the

date   of  receipt  of   notice  or  not   later   than  2  weeks

before   the   date   appointed   for   hearing,   whichever   be

earlier, but shall do so only by setting out the grounds

in opposition to the questions of law or grounds set out

in the SLP and may produce such pleadings and documents

filed before the Court/Tribunal against whose order the

SLP is filed and shall also set out the grounds for not

granting interim order or for vacating interim order if

already granted.”

 

­2­

It   is   submitted   that   as   per   tracking   report   (copy

enclosed), notice has been undelivered with postal remarks,

”insufficient   address”   and   “addresee   left”   in   respect   of

Respondent Nos. 2 & 3 respectively.

Service   of   notice   is   not   complete   upon   respondent

nos. 2 & 3. 

The matter above mentioned is listed before the Ld.

Registrar Court with this Office Report.

Dated this the 07th day of February, 2020.

      BRANCH OFFICER

Copy to :

Mr. Ram Lal Roy, Advocate 

       BRANCH OFFICER

BA

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top