http://JUDIS.NIC.IN

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Page 1 of 2

CASE NO.:

Special Leave Petition (civil) 20182-20184 of 2003

PETITIONER:

Narne Rama Murthy

RESPONDENT:

Ravula Somasundaram & Ors.

DATE OF JUDGMENT: 17/08/2005

BENCH:

S. N. Variava & Tarun Chatterjee

JUDGMENT:

JUDGMENT

O R D E R

[with SLP (C) Nos. 20226-20228 of 2003]

Heard parties at great length.

These Special Leave Petitions are against the Judgments of the

Andhra Pradesh High Court dated 21st December, 2001 dismissing the

Appeal filed by the Petitioners and the Judgment dated 4th October,

2002 dismissing the Review Petition.

We see no substance in the contention that there has been non-

appreciation or misinterpretation of evidence. In our view, the Courts

below have correctly analyzed the evidence on record and correctly

concluded, on the basis of material on record, that the Petitioner had

entered into the Agreement to Sell not just on his own behalf but also

on behalf of the other parties. The Courts below also have correctly

recorded that the possession had been taken on behalf of all.

The case s