SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

B.N. AGRAWAL,HARJIT SINGH BEDI,G.S. SINGHVI, ,
SYED ABDUL QADIR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF BIHAR . – Respondent


Advocates:
AKHILESH KUMAR PANDEYGOPAL SINGH

REPORTABLE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 3351-3354 OF 2003

Syed Abdul Qadir & Ors.

….. Appellants

Vs.

State of Bihar & Ors. ….. Respondents

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 3355 of 2003

&

CIVIL APPEAL NO.3364 OF 2003

J U D G M E N T

B.N. AGRAWAL,J.

1.

These appeals by special leave are directed against the common judgment of

Patna High Court whereby a Division Bench of that Court dismissed letters patent

appeals preferred by the appellants herein against that part of the judgment of the

learned Single Judge in which it was decided that Office Order dated 16.11.2000

issued by the Finance Department, Government of Bihar, providing that fixation

of pay scale on promotion of Assistant Teachers of the Government taken over

Schools [the Nationalised Schools] in the State of Bihar shall be governed by

Fundamental Rule 22(1)(a)(2) [FR.22(I)(a)(2)] instead of Fundamental Rule 22-C

[FR.22-C], was valid. By the same judgment, the Division Bench allowed letters

patent appeals preferred by the State of Bihar and set aside that part of judgment

of the learned Single Judge whereby it was decided th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top