SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MURULY M.S. – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
SLP(C) No.-012246 / 2022 01-08-2022



Advocates:
S. K. VERMA

SLP(C)No.12246/22

1

ITEM NO.10 COURT NO.1 SECTION IV-A

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).12246/2022

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06-06-2022

in WP No.10688/2022 passed by the High Court of Karnataka at

Bengaluru)

MURULY M.S. Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS. Respondent(s)

IA No.94865/2022 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT

IA No.94864/2022 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED

JUDGMENT

Date : 01-08-2022 This matter was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA MURARI

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI

For Petitioner(s)

Mr. Mahabir Singh, Sr.Adv.

Mr. S. K. Verma, AOR

For Respondent(s)

Mr. Harish N.Salve, Sr.Adv.

Mr. Gautam Awasthi, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R

1.

Heard Mr. Mahabir Singh, learned Senior counsel appearing

on behalf of the petitioner as also Mr. Harish N.Salve, learned

Senior counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent No.3 - Trust

and carefully perused the material placed on record.

2.

The present Special Leave Petition arises out of the

impugned order dated 06.06.2022, passed by the High Court of

Karnataka in W.P.(C)No.10688 of 2022.

3.

The petitioner’s main contention is that it is the

State’s responsibility to take care of abandoned or rescued

elephants, which duty should not be abdicated in favour of the

private respondent No.3 – Trust.

Digitally signed by

SATISH KUMAR YADAV

Date: 2022.08.02

17:29:37 IST

Reason:

Signature Not Verified

SLP(C)No.12246/22

2

4.

Mr.Harish N.Salve, learned Senior counsel appears on

behalf of the respondent No.3 – Trust and submits that the High

Court of Karnataka has considered all the submissions of the

present petitioner and has disposed of the underlying PIL with

certain directions. He submits that the respondent No.3 – Trust

undertakes to comply with all the directions passed by the High

Court and will take utmost care of the rescued elephants.

5.

On perusing the directions passed by the High Court of

Karnataka and on considering the submissions of the learned

counsel, we are not inclined to interfere with the order dated

06.06.2022 passed by the High Court of Karnataka.

6.

The Special Leave Petition is, accordingly, dismissed.

7.

Liberty is granted

to the parties to make a

representation to the State Government, if any other issue arises

in the future.

8.

All pending applications are disposed of on the above

terms.

(SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (R.S. NARAYANAN)

DEPUTY REGISTRAR COURT MASTER (NSH)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top