SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

MARKANDEY KATJU,CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD, , ,
AJITSINGH HARNAMSINGH GUJRAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent


Advocates:
ASHA GOPALAN NAIR

1

REPORTABLE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1969 OF 2009

Ajitsingh Harnamsingh Gujral

..

Appellant

-versus-

State of Maharashtra

..

Respondent

J U D G M E N T

MARKANDEY KATJU, J.

“Qareeb hai yaaron roz-e-

mahshar,

Chupega kushton ka khoon

kyonkar,

Jo chup rahegi zubaan-e-

khanjar,

Lahu pukaaregaa aasteen

ka”

- Ameer Minai

2

1.

Heard Shri Jaspal Singh, learned senior counsel for the

appellant and learned counsel for the State of Maharashtra for the

respondent. This is an appeal by special leave against the

judgment of the Bombay High Court dated 26.6.2006, which has

confirmed the death sentence of the appellant given by the learned

Sessions Judge dated 19.3.2005.

2.

The accused is a businessman. He was a married man having

one son and two daughters. He was married with the deceased

Kanwaljeet Kaur about 25 to 27 years prior to the incident dated

10.4.2003. He had a son Amandeep Singh aged about 20 years

and two daughters viz. Neeti and Taniya, aged about 22 years and

13 years respectively. All of them were allegedly killed by the

accused in the early hours of the morning of 10.4.2003

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top