SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
P. SATHASIVAM,J. CHELAMESWAR
UNION OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
RAMESH GANDHI – Respondent
Crl.A. No.-001356-001356 / 2004
14-11-2011
P. PARMESWARANPRASHANT CHAUDHARY
Reportable
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1356 OF 2004
Union of India & Ors.
…….. Appellants
Versus
Ramesh Gandhi
……… Respondent
J U D G E M E N T
Chelameswar, J.
1.
This appeal arises out of a judgment of the High Court of
Calcutta dated 23rd November, 2001 in Writ Petition No. 352/2001.
The appellants herein were the respondents in the above-mentioned
Writ Petition.
2.
An FIR came to be registered on 15th November, 2000 in the
Delhi Special Police Establishment, Ranchi Branch in Crime No. RC
13(A)/2000 (R) under Section 120B read with Section 420 IPC and
Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of
Corruption Act, 1988 against nine accused of whom the first
1
accused was the Coal Controller at the relevant point of time. The
next five accused were the officers of Central Coalfields Limited
(hereinafter ‘CCL’. for short), which is a subsidiary of Coal India
Limited (hereinafter ‘CIL’, for short). Accused No.9 is a Private
Limited Company (hereinafter ‘private company’, for short) and
accused Nos. 7 and 8 are the members of the said private company.
3.
The sole respondent, Mr. Ramesh Gandhi, is one of the
members of the above-mentioned private company and shown to be
the seventh accused in the above-mentioned FIR. He filed writ
petition No. 352/2001 on the file of the Calcutta High Court praying
that the above-mentioned FIR be quashed. By the judgment under
appeal, the Calcutta High Court allowed the writ petition quashing
the FIR.
4.
The substance of the accusation in the FIR is that all the
accused entered into a criminal conspiracy to confer an illegal and
unjust benefit on the above-mentioned private company. In the
process, the accused, “intentionally and dishonestly” suppressed
certain relevant and crucial facts (in the various cases filed before
the Calcutta High Court and also this Court to which the accused
were parties), which resulted in orders being passed both by this
Court as well as by the High Court favourable to the private
company.
2
5.
FIR reads as follows:
“DELHI SPECIAL POLICE ESTABLISHMENT, RANCHI
BRANCH
FIRST INFORMATION REPORT
Crime No.RC 13(A)/2000(R), Date and time of Report :
15.11.2000 at 1700 Hrs.
Place of occurrence with State : Calcutta (West Bengal), Ranchi
(Jharkhand)
Date and time of occurrence : 1990-91 to 2000
Name of complainant or informant with address : Through Source
Offence : U/s. 120B r/w 420 IPC and Sec. 13(2) r/w 13(1)(d) of PC
Act, 1988.
Name and address of the accused : (1) Shri P.N. Tiwary, the then
Coal Controller, Calcutta (retd.)
(2) Shri R.P. Srivastava, the then G.M. Sales, CCL, Ranchi (retd.)
(3) Shri S.K. Srivastava, G.M. (Sales), CCL, Ranchi
(4) Shri B. Akla, CMD, CCL, Ranchi
(5) Shri K.M. Singh, the then G.M., Argada Area, CCL
(6) Shri Sudarshan Singh, the then Area Sales Officer Argada
Area, CCL, presently Superintending Engineer (E&M), N.K. Area,
CCL
(7)
Shri Ramesh Gandhi, Prop. M/s. Continental Transport
Constn. Corpn., (CTCC), Dhanbad (Pvt).
(8) Shri Mahesh Gandhi of M/s. CTCC, Dhanbad (Pvt.)
(9) M/s. Continental Transport Construction Corpn. (CTCC),
Dhanbad (Pvt.)
Action taken : Regular case registered and investigation taken up.
Investigation Officer: Shri A. Prasad, DSP, CBI, SPE, Ranchi
3
INFORMATION
A reliable information has been received to the effect that Shri
P.N. Tiwary, the then Coal Controller (since retd.), Calcutta, Shri
R.P. Srivastava, the then G.M.(Sales), CCL, Ranchi (since retd.),
Shri S.K. Srivastava, the then GM.(Sales), CCL, Ranchi, Shri B.
Akla, the then Chief of Marketing, Coal India Limited, Calcutta,
Director (Technical) and (Projects and Planning), CCL and
presently Chairman-cum-Managing Director, Central Coalfields
Ltd. (CCL), Ranchi, Shri K.M. Singh, the then G.M., Argada Area,
CCL, Shri Sudarshan Singh, the then Ar