SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIMANSHU MARATKAR – Appellant
Versus
SIDDHARTH SUHAS BHAGAT – Respondent


Advocates:
DEEPAK GOEL

ITEM NO.18 COURT NO.12 SECTION II-A

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 8616/2019

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 01-04-2019

in CRLWP No. 262/2019 passed by the High Court of Judicature at

Bombay)

HIMANSHU MARATKAR Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

SIDDHARTH SUHAS BHAGAT & ANR. Respondent(s)

(IA No. 138030/2019 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED

JUDGMENT)

Date : 23-09-2019 This matter was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI

For Petitioner(s)

Mr. Rit Arora, Adv.

Mr. Deepak Goel, AOR

For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R

We are of the opinion that the Special Leave Petition is

premature at this stage and we decline to interfere.

The Special Leave Petition is dismissed.

Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disp

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top