SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

WAHID KHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M.P. – Respondent


Advocates:
R. C. KAUSHIK

REPORTABLE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1798 OF 2008

Wahid Khan

…..Appellant

Versus

State of Madhya Pradesh

…..Respondent

J U D G M E N T

Deepak Verma, J.

1.

A minor girl aged about 12 years was subjected to

rape by the appellant on 14th October 1988. The appellant was

charged and prosecuted for commission of offence under

Sections 366 and 376 of the Indian Penal Code (for short,

‘IPC’) and the co-accused Sneh Lata was charged under

Sections 342 and 366, IPC in the Court of III Additional

Sessions Judge, Bhopal in Sessions Case No.53/89.

2.

Judgment was pronounced in the said Sessions Case on

17th May 1991 wherein and whereby co-accused Sneh Lata was

acquitted of the charges levelled against her, but the

appellant was found guilty of commission of offence under

Section 376, IPC and was awarded seven years’ rigorous

imprisonment. Insofar as the charge levelled against him

under Section 366 was concerned, he was acquitted by the said

court.

3.

Feeling aggrieved by the said judgment of conviction,

appellant preferred Criminal Appeal No.548 of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top