SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ASHOK KUMAR NIGAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF U.P. – Respondent


Advocates:
ABHIJIT SENGUPTARAVI PRAKASH MEHROTRA

1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL NO.(S).3908 OF 2016

(Arising out of SLP(C)No.20042 of 2012)

ASHOK KUMAR NIGAM Appellant(s)

VERSUS

STATE OF UTTAR PRADES & ANR. Respondent(s)

O R D E R

Leave granted.

The appellant was serving as an Additional District and

Sessions Judge in the Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service. He

was charged with misconduct, found guilty and awarded a punishment

of stoppage of two increments with cumulative effect. Aggrieved,

he preferred a writ petition before the High Court in which he

assailed not only the finding of the guilt but even the punishment

awarded to him. A Division Bench of the High Court, while

upholding the finding of guilt, took the view that instead of

stoppage of two increments, the appellant should have been

Digitally signed by

Mahabir Singh

Date: 2016.04.19

17:33:16 IST

Reason:

Signature Not Verified

2

punished more severely by directing his removal from service. The

High Court accordingly directed issue of a notice to the appellant

to show cause why he should not be re

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top