SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

S.H. KAPADIA,A.K. PATNAIK,SWATANTER KUMAR
AVISHEK GOENKA – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates:

Page 1

JUDGMENT

1

REPORTABLE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION

WRIT

PETITION

(CIVIL)

NO.

285

OF

2010

Avishek Goenka

… Petitioner

Versus

Union of India & Anr.

… Respondents

J U D G M

E N T

Swatanter

Kumar,

J .

1.

The petitioner is a businessman engaged in the business

of distribution of pre-paid virtual and tangible calling value for

mobile phone subscribers and also sells new customer

acquisition packs and follows it up, by collection of customer

application forms and executing tele-calling, to verify customer

credentials. In this Public Interest Litigation, the petitioner

has attempted to highlight the grave issue of non-observance

of norms/regulations/guidelines related to proper and effective

subscriber verification by various service providers. In fact,

according to the petitioner, there is rampant flouting of

norms/regulations/guidelines relating to this subject matter

and there is no proper verification of the subscribers prior to

Page 2

JUDGMENT

2

selling of the pre-paid mobile connections to them.

2.

The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (for short,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top