SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – Appellant
Versus
RADHAKISHAN – Respondent
SLP(Crl) No.-005510 / 2018
06-05-2022
PASHUPATHI NATH RAZDAN
1
ITEM NO.42 COURT NO.2 SECTION II-A
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No.5510/2018
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 10-11-2017
in CRLA No.435/2000 passed by the High Court Of M.P. At Gwalior)
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
RADHAKISHAN Respondent(s)
(IA No.83168/2018 – FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)
Date : 06-05-2022 This matter was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA
For Petitioner(s)
Ms. Swarupama Chaturvedi, Adv./AAG
Mr. Pashupathi Nath Razdan, AOR
Mr. Prithviraj Singh, Adv.
Mr. Yashraj Singh Bundela, Adv.
Mirza Kayesh Begg, Adv.
Mr. Astik Gupta, Adv.
Mr. Prakhar Srivastav, Adv.
Ms. Sneh Bairwa, Adv.
Ms. Saumya Kapoor, Adv.
Ms. Himanshi Goel, Adv.
For Respondent(s)
Mr. Sumeer Sodhi, AOR
Mr. Abhishek Lalwani, Adv.
Ms. Dhreti Bhatia, Adv.
Mr. Siddhanth Gupta, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
The respondent-accused was convicted under Section 302 of the
Indian Penal Code, 1860 (“IPC” for short) and sentenced to suffer
imprisonment for life. In an appeal arising from the decision of
the Trial Court, the High Court converted the offence to one under
Digitally signed by Dr.
Mukesh Nasa
Date: 2022.05.07
12:06:33 IST
Reason:
Signature Not Verified
2
Section 304 Part-II of the IPC and sentenced the respondent to
suffer rigorous imprisonment for seven years.
The judgment rendered by the High Court is presently under
challenge.
Having considered the submissions advanced by Ms. Swarupama
Chaturvedi, learned Additional Advocate General for the State and
Mr. Sumeer Sodhi, learned Advocate for the respondent-accused, in
our considered view, the interest of justice would be met if, while
sustaining the order passed by the High Court, direction is issued
to the respondent-accused to compensate the heirs and legal
representatives of the deceased.
We, therefore, direct as under:
a.
The respondent-accused shall deposit a sum of
Rs.7,50,000/- (Rupees Seven Lakhs Fifty Thousand
Only) in the Registry of the Trial Court within 12
weeks from today. An affidavit of compliance shall
be filed in the Registry of this Court within a week
of such deposit.
This deposit shall be in addition to the fine
imposed by the High Court.
b.
Upon such deposit, the Trial Court shall make over
the sum to the heirs and legal representatives of
the deceased Govind, after being satisfied about the
proof of identity of such heirs and legal
representatives.
3
c.
In order to facilitate the exercise, the concerned
Police Station shall get in touch with the heirs and
legal representatives and facilitate their presence
before the Trial Court.
d.
In case the amount is not deposited, this order
shall stand recalled and the instant petition shall
be listed for fresh disposal.
With these observations, the Special Leave Petition is
disposed of.
Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
(MUKESH NASA) (PREETHI T.C.)
COURT MASTER BRANCH OFFICER