SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CHINAYYA HEGDE – Appellant
Versus
MOHAN HEGDE – Respondent
/ 0 16-05-2023



Advocates:
ANANTHA NARAYANA M.G.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

INHERENT JURISDICTION

REVIEW PETITION (C) No._________ OF 2023

(Diary No.22347 of 2022)

IN

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No.25824 OF 2013

CHINAYYA HEGDE PETITIONER(S)

VERSUS

MOHAN HEGDE & ORS. RESPONDENT(S)

O R D E R

The application to discharge the earlier Advocate on

record is allowed.

There is a delay of 2525 days in filing the review

petition. We do not think that the petitioner has given

any sufficient reasons to condone the delay. The

application for condonation of delay will stand

dismissed.

Even otherwise, we do not think that the petitioner

has made out a case for entertaining the review. The

review petition is dismissed on the ground of delay and

on merits.

………………………………………J.

[K.M. JOSEPH]

………………………………………J.

[AJAY RASTOGI]

NEW DELHI

DATED; MAY 16, 2023

Digitally signed by

Jagdish Kumar

Date: 2023.05.19

13:03:21 IST

Reason:

Signature Not Verified

ITEM NO.1001 SECTION IV-A

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

REVIEW PETITION (CIVIL) DIARY NO(S). 22347/2022

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 05-08-2013

in SLP(C) No.25824/2013 passed by the Supreme Court of India)

CHINAYYA HEGDE PETITIONER(S)

VERSUS

MOHAN HEGDE & ORS. RESPONDENT(S)

IA No. 99893/2022 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING

IA No. 99895/2022 - DISCHARGE OF ADVOCATE ON RECORD)

Date : 16-05-2023 These matters were called on for hearing today.

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.M. JOSEPH

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI

By Circulation

UPON perusing papers the Court made the following

O R D E R

The application to discharge the earlier Advocate on record is

allowed.

There is a delay of 2525 days in filing the review petition.

We do not think that the petitioner has given any sufficient

reasons to condone the delay. The application for condonation of

delay will stand dismissed.

Even otherwise, we do not think that the petitioner has made

out a case for entertaining the review. The review petition is

dismissed on the ground of delay and on merits.

Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of.

(JAGDISH KUMAR) (RENU KAPOOR)

COURT MASTER (SH) ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

(Original signed order is placed on the file)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top