SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SULTHAN SAID IBRAHIM – Appellant
Versus
PRAKASAN – Respondent


Advocates:
HARSHAD V. HAMEED

ITEM NO.14 Court 10 (Video Conferencing) SECTION XI-A

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 4307/2022

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 29-11-2021

in OPC No. 2290/2013 passed by the High Court of Kerala at

Ernakulam)

SULTHAN SAID IBRAHIM Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

PRAKASAN & ORS. Respondent(s)

(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.35232/2022-EXEMPTION FROM FILING

O.T.)

Date : 14-03-2022 This petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.M. JOSEPH

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HRISHIKESH ROY

For Petitioner(s)

Mr. V. Chitambaresh, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Harshad V. Hameed, AOR

Mr. Govind Venugopal, Adv.

Mr. Dileep Poolakkot, Adv.

Mrs. Ashly Harshad, Adv.

For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R

The petitioner is granted time to produce additional

documents in the form of I.A. No. 669/2009, the order passed

therein, in the civil revision pe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top