SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

RATANLAL – Appellant
Versus
PRAHLAD JAT – Respondent


Advocates:
ABHISHEK GUPTASARAD KUMAR SINGHANIA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO(S). 500 OF 2014

GIRDHARI LAL & ANR.

...APPELLANT(S)

VERSUS

STATE OF RAJASTHAN

...RESPONDENT(S)

O R D E R

The criminal appeal is dismissed as not pressed.

........................J.

( J. CHELAMESWAR )

........................J.

(PRAFULLA C. PANT)

NEW DELHI,

OCTOBER 25, 2016.

Digitally signed by OM

PARKASH SHARMA

Date: 2016.10.27

05:28:28 IST

Reason:

Signature Not Verified

ITEM NO.26 COURT NO.4 SECTION II

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Criminal Appeal No(s). 499/2014

RATANLAL Appellant(s)

VERSUS

PRAHLAD JAT & OTHER Respondent(s)

(with appln. (s) for stay and office report)

WITH

Crl.A. No. 500/2014

(With Office Report)

Date : 25/10/2016 These appeals were called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J. CHELAMESWAR

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAFULLA C. PANT

For Appellant(s)

Mr. Abhishek Gupta,Adv.

For Respondent(s)

Mr. Milind Kumar,Adv.

Ms. Cha

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top