SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
MOHANDAS BALAKRISHNA JADHAV – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA HOME DEPARTMENT – Respondent
Crl.A. No.-001589-001589 / 2015 14-09-2017



Advocates:
N. ANNAPOORANI

ITEM NO.103 COURT NO.11 SECTION II-A

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Criminal Appeal No(s). 1589/2015

MOHANDAS BALKRISHNA JADHAV Appellant(s)

VERSUS

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Respondent(s)

Date : 14-09-2017 This appeal was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT

For Appellant(s)

Ms. Vibha Datta Makhija,Sr.Adv.

Ms. N. Annapoorani, AOR

For Respondent(s)

Mr. Sachin Patil,Adv.

Mr. Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R

The appeal is dismissed in terms of the

signed order.

(MADHU BALA) (PARVEEN KUMARI PASRICHA)

COURT MASTER (SH) BRANCH OFFICER

(Signed order is placed on the file)

Digitally signed by

MADHU BALA

Date: 2017.09.16

10:51:32 IST

Reason:

Signature Not Verified

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1589 OF 2015

MOHANDAS BALKRISHNA JADHAV ...APPELLANT(S)

VERSUS

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

...RESPONDENT(S)

O R D E R

Heard learned counsel for the parties and

perused the record.

We do not find any ground to interfere with

the conviction and sentence of the appellant.

The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.

…...................J.

[ADARSH KUMAR GOEL]

NEW DELHI

…...................J.

14th SEPTEMBER, 2017

[UDAY UMESH LALIT]

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top