SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

J.M. PANCHAL,GYAN SUDHA MISRA, , ,
RANGAMMAL – Appellant
Versus
KUPPUSWAMI – Respondent


Advocates:
KRISHNAMURTHI SWAMI

REPORTABLE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 562 OF 2003

RANGAMMAL

.. Appellant

Versus

KUPPUSWAMI & ANR.

..Respondents

J U D G M E N T

GYAN SUDHA MISRA, J.

This appeal by special leave has been filed by the

appellant Tmt. Rangammal against the order dated

11.07.2002 passed by the learned single Judge of the High

Court of Judicature at Madras in Second Appeal No.

703/1992 by which the appeal was dismissed by

practically a summary order although the substantial

question of law which was formulated at the time of

admission of the appeal was as follows:

“Whether the sale deed executed by the

de facto guardian on behalf of the minor

without the permission of the court

could be held to be valid ?

2.

However, on hearing the appeal in the light of

the prevailing facts and circumstances of the instant

matter, we are of the view that the question also arises

whether in a partition suit filed by the plaintiff/respondent

No.1 herein, the courts below could shift the burden of

proof on the defendant - appellant regarding the validity of

a sale deed, whic

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top