SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DORAISWAMY RAJU,ARIJIT PASAYAT.
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Appellant
Versus
KASHIRAO . – Respondent


Advocates:
RAVINDRA KESHAVRAO ADSUREKAILASH CHAND

http://JUDIS.NIC.IN

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Page 1 of 6

CASE NO.:

Appeal (crl.) 124 of 2003

PETITIONER:

State of Maharashtra

RESPONDENT:

Vs.

Kashirao & Ors.

DATE OF JUDGMENT: 27/08/2003

BENCH:

DORAISWAMY RAJU & ARIJIT PASAYAT.

JUDGMENT:

J U D G M E N T

ARIJIT PASAYAT, J.

On 27.12.1987 Subhash Warankar (hereinafter referred to as the

’deceased’) lost his life and Pundlik (PW-1) was seriously injured.

Allegedly, the respondents were the assailants. The Additional Sessions

Judge, Amravati found them guilty of offences punishable under Sections

302, 307, 147, 148, 452 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code,

1860 (in short the ’IPC’). Each was sentenced to undergo imprisonment

for life and three years for the offences relatable with Section 302

read with Section 149 and Section 307 read with Section 149 IPC

respectively. One person, namely, Mohan was tried along with the

respondents. Since he died during the pendency of the trial the matter

was abated so far as he is concerned.

Factual scenario according to the prosecution is as follows:

Relationshi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top