SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
HARYANA SHEHRI VIKAS PRADHIKARAN – Appellant
Versus
NEW SPRING DALE PUBLIC SCHOOL – Respondent
/ 0 26-11-2021



Advocates:
SANJAY KUMAR VISEN

ITEM NO.4 Court 15 (Video Conferencing) SECTION IV-B

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No(s). 24533/2021

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 22-11-2018

in CWP No. 22651/2018 passed by the High Court Of Punjab & Haryana

At Chandigarh)

HARYANA SHEHRI VIKAS PRADHIKARAN Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

NEW SPRING DALE PUBLIC SCHOOL & ANR. Respondent(s)

(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.146082/2021-CONDONATION OF DELAY

IN FILING and IA No.146086/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE

IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.146080/2021-PERMISSION TO FILE

ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES )

Date : 26-11-2021 This petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM NATH

For Petitioner(s)

Mr. Anil Grover, Sr. AAG

Ms. Noopur Singhal, Adv.

Mr. Rahul Khurana, Adv.

Mr. Satish Kumar, Adv.

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen, AOR

Ms. Babita Mishra, Adv.

For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R

The petitioner-Haryana Shehri Vikas Pradhikaran attempted to

challenge an order dated 22.08.2015 passed by the revisional

authority under the Haryana Urban Development Authority Act, 1977

directing restoration of allotment of a plot of land admeasuring

one acre at Sector 55-56, Gurugram, Haryana in favour of the

respondent-New Spring Dale Public School.

Digitally signed by

SUNIL KUMAR

Date: 2021.11.27

10:28:37 IST

Reason:

Signature Not Verified

2

The writ petition filed in the year 2018 was dismissed by the

Division Bench of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, for being

not satisfied with the cause stated towards an inordinate delay of

about three years in approaching the Court.

Seeking to question the said order of the High Court

22.11.2018, the present petition seeking leave to appeal has been

filed on 07.10.2021. The application seeking condonation of delay

mainly states the reason that the matter was under examination at

“various levels” and then, a few decisions of this Court are

referred to submit that certain amount of latitude is not

impermissible in regard to delay in litigation brought about by the

State.

The said decisions do not make out any case for condonation of

an inordinate delay in filing the present petition and that too

where a local body seeks to question the order passed by the

Additional Chief Secretary to the Government in its revisional

jurisdiction. No case for condonation of delay being made out, the

application being I.A. No. 146082 of 2021 is rejected.

Consequently, the petition stands dismissed on the ground of

delay.

(GULSHAN KUMAR ARORA) (SUNIL KUMAR RAJVANSHI)

AR-CUM-PS BRANCH OFFICER

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top