SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

A.K. PATNAIK,V. GOPALA GOWDA
ADAMBHAI SULEMANBHAI AJMERI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Advocates:
IRSHAD AHMADHEMANTIKA WAHI

REPORTABLE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 2295-2296 OF 2010

Adambhai Sulemanbhai Ajmeri & Ors. …Appellants

Versus

State of Gujarat

...Respondent

WITH

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 45 OF 2011

J U D G M E N T

V.GOPALA GOWDA, J.

These appeals are filed by the convicted accused-

appellants as they are aggrieved by the conviction and

sentences awarded to them by the Special Court (POTA),

Crl.A.Nos.2295-2296 of 2010 -2-

and confirmed by the High Court of Gujarat for the

offences punishable under the provisions of the Indian

Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter ‘IPC’), the Arms Act,

1959, the Explosive Substances Act, 1908 and the

Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 (hereinafter ‘POTA’)

as per list in para 2 below, for the attack on the

Akshardham temple in Gandhinagar between the afternoon

of

24.09.2002

and

early

morning

of

25.09.2002,

wherein 33 people were killed and more than 85 people

were injured.

2. The following list outlines the charges against

each of the accused and the conviction and sentences

meted out to them by the Special Court (POTA),

Ahme

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top