SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

V. GOPALA GOWDA,C. NAGAPPAN
K SUBRAMANI – Appellant
Versus
K DAMODARA NAIDU – Respondent


Advocates:
VAIJAYANTHI GIRISH

Page 1

JUDGMENT

1

1

REPORTABLE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 2402 OF 2014

[ Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.6197 of 2014]

K. Subramani

… Appellant(s)

versus

K. Damodara Naidu

… Respondent(s)

J U D G M E N T

C. NAGAPPAN, J.

1.

Leave granted.

2.

This appeal is preferred against judgment and order

dated 10.10.2013 passed by the High Court of Karnataka at

Bangalore in Criminal Appeal No.368 of 2009 wherein the

Page 2

JUDGMENT

2

2

High Court set aside the judgment of acquittal of the trial

court and remanded the case to the trial court for retrial.

2

3.

The respondent herein/complainant and the

appellant/accused were working as lecturers in a

Government College at Bangalore. The case of the

complainant is that the accused borrowed a loan of Rs.14

lakhs in cash on 1.12.1997 from him to start granite

business, promising to repay the same with 3% interest per

month on demand and issued post-dated cheque dated

30.11.2000 for sum of Rs.29,12,000/- which included

principal and interest and few days prior to presentation of

the cheque on its due date to b

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top