SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

THE CORPORATION OF MADRAS AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
M. PARTHASARATHY AND OTHERS – Respondent


Advocates:
M. YOGESH KANNAR. CHANDRACHUD

ITEM NO.108 COURT NO.8 SECTION XII

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Civil Appeal No.3033/2006

THE CORPORATION OF MADRAS AND ANOTHER Appellant(s)

VERSUS

M. PARTHASARATHY & ORS.

Respondent(s)

(and IA No.59928/2017-APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS and IA

No.69906/2017-CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION

and

IA

No.114627/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS)

Date : 29-11-2017 These matters were called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL

For Appellant(s)

Mr. M. Yogesh Kanna, AOR

Mrs. Sujatha Bagadhi, Adv.

For Respondent(s)

Mr. A. Mariarputham, Sr. Adv.

Ms. Aruna Mathur, Adv.

Mr. Avneesh Arputham, Adv.

Ms. Anuradha Arputham, Adv.

Ms. Simran Jeet, Adv.

M/S. Arputham Aruna And Co.

Mr. R. Chandrachud, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R

It has been mentioned that learned counsel for the the

petitioner is not well and a request for adjournment has been made.

As pr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top