SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

NEELKANTH TOWNSHIP AND CONSTRUCTION PVT LTD – Appellant
Versus
URBAN INFRASTRUCTURE TRUSTEE LTD – Respondent
C.A. No.-010711 / 2017 23-08-2017



Advocates:
KUSH CHATURVEDI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 10711 OF 2017

NEELKANTH TOWNSHIP AND CONSTRUCTION PVT LTD Appellant(s)

VERSUS

URBAN INFRASTRUCTURE TRUSTEES LTD Respondent(s)

O R D E R

Heard the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the parties.

We do not find any reason to interfere with the order dated

11.08.2017 passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal,

New Delhi.

In view of this, we find no merit in the appeal.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed keeping the question of

law viz. whether the Limitation Act would apply to this proceeding,

open.

......................... J.

(ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN)

.......................... J.

(SANJAY KISHAN KAUL)

New Delhi;

August 23, 2017.

Digitally signed by

R.NATARAJAN

Date: 2017.08.25

16:15:31 IST

Reason:

Signature Not Verified

ITEM NO.9 COURT NO.13 SECTION XIV

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Civil Appeal No(s). 10711/2017

NEELKANTH TOWNSHIP AND CONSTRUCTION PVT LTD Appellant(s)

VERSUS

URBAN INFRASTRUCTURE TRUSTEES LTD Respondent(s)

(IA No.77259/2017-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED

JUDGMENT and IA No.77258/2017-EX-PARTE STAY)

Date : 23-08-2017 This appeal was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL

For Appellant(s)

Mr. K.V. Vishwanathan, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Kush Chaturvedi, AOR

Mr. Aman Varma, Adv.

Mr. Saket Mone, Adv.

Ms. Anshula Grover, Adv.

Ms. Chaitrika Patki, Adv.

Ms. Smriti Churiwal, Adv.

For Respondent(s)

Mr. Arvind P. Datar, Sr. Adv.

Mr. Pratap Venugopal, Adv.

Ms. Surekha Raman, Adv.

Ms. Niharika, Adv.

Ms. Kanika Kalaiyarasan, Adv.

For K J John And Co, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R

The appeal is dismissed keeping the question of law viz.

whether the Limitation Act would apply to this proceeding, open in

terms of the signed order.

(R. NATARAJAN) (SAROJ KUMARI GAUR)

COURT MASTER COURT MASTER

(Signed order is placed on the file)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top