SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

ITEM NO.11 Court 11 (Video Conferencing) SECTION XVI-A S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 20075/2021 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 30-07-2021 in OW104 No. 46/2013 passed by the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh at Jammu)

VIPAN AGGARWAL & ANR. Petitioner(s)

VERSUS RAMAN GANDOTRA & ORS. Respondent(s)

(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. )

Date : 11-12-2021 This petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ninad Laud, Adv.

Mr. Sahil Tagotra, AOR Mr. Rahul Sharma, Adv.

Mr. Ivo MS D'Costa, Adv.

Mr. Avinash Mathews, Adv.

For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R

Learned counsel for the petitioners relies upon a judgment of this Court reported in (1993) 1 SCC 581 titled ‘Banwari Lal Vs. Chando Devi (Smt.) (Through LRs.) & Anr.’ to contend that the option with the petitioners was to approach the Court which passed the compromise decree as well as to file an appeal. Once the petitioners have invoked the jurisdiction of the Court which passed the compromise decree, the peti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top