IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.  1618  OF 2019

(Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.  9873  of 2019)

(@ SLP (Crl.) Diary No.26654 of 2019)

BARUN CHANDRA THAKUR

     ...APPELLANT(S)

  VS.

RYAN AUGUSTINE PINTO & ANR.

            ...RESPONDENT(S)

O R D E R

1.

Delay condoned. Permission to file SLP is granted. Leave granted.

With the  consent  of  counsel  of   the  parties,  the   appeal  was  heard

finally.

2.

The  respondent  had   approached   the   Punjab   &  Haryana  High

Court   seeking   modification   of   orders   made   previously,   which   had

granted   anticipatory   bail   to   him.   By   the   impugned   order,   the

conditions   governing   his   anticipatory   bail   were   modified.   In   these

circumstances, the father of the victim of the crime has approached

this   Court,   claiming   to   be   aggrieved   by   the   modifications   in   the

impugned order.

3. 

The facts necessary for the purpose of this order are brief; a First

Information Report (FIR No. 250 dated 08.09.2017) was registered for

offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860

(“IPC”) read with Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959, Sec