SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SUDESH CHHIKARA – Appellant
Versus
RAMTI DEVI – Respondent


Advocates:
KANHAIYA SINGHAL

ITEM NO.96 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IV-B

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. SURINDER S. RATHI

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 20106/2019

SUDESH CHHIKARA Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

RAMTI DEVI & ANR. Respondent(s)

(IA No.126864/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED

JUDGMENT )

Date : 26-11-2019 This petition was called on for hearing today.

For Petitioner(s)

Mr. Kanhaiya Singhal, AOR

For Respondent(s) Mr.Rahul Dhankar,Adv.

Mr. Subhasish Bhowmick, AOR

Mr.Rajat Sharma,Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R

Ld.counsel for the respondent is present.

Ld.counsel for the petitioner is not present.

Respondent No.1 has already filed counter affidavit.

Ld.counsel for the petitioner is directed to file the

affidavit in proof of dasti notice in respect of respondent No.2

within four weeks.

List

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top